Monday to Friday:
07:30 - 16:00
Please read our estrela bet:Privacy Notice for the terms on the collection of your personal information.
By using this Query Form, you agree to the collection of personal data. For more information, you may refer to our estrela bet:Privacy Notice.
Padre Faura St., Ermita, Manila
Philippines 1000
Follow us on Twitter .
Thank you for your continuedཧ support and feedback.
For queries and comments,
please email us at:
estrela bet: pio.royalesporte666.net
chiefjusticehelpdesk@
judiciary.royalesporte666.net
Padre Faura St., Ermita, Manila
Philippines 1000
Follow us on Twitter .
Th♔ank you for your continued support and feedback.
For queries and comments,
please email us at:
estrela bet: pio.royalesporte666.net
chiefjusticehelpdesk@
judiciary.royalesporte666.net
Padre Faura St., Ermita, Manila
Philippines 1000
Follow us on Twitter .
Thank you꧋ for your continued support and feedback.
For queries and comments,
please email us at:
estrela bet: pio.royalesporte666.net
chiefjusticehelpdesk@
judiciary.royalesporte666.net
Statement of Commitment to Data Privacy and Security
The Supreme Court of the Philippines respects your privacy and your data privacy rights, as well as employs reasonable measures to protect your personal data in accordance with Republic Act No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (DPA), its Implementing♐ Rules and Regulations, and the various issuances of the National Privacy Commission (NPC) (collectively, the Data Privacy Regulations).
Brief Service Description and Its General Purpose
Use of the Supreme Court WebsiteThe Supreme Court website serves as the online repository of Supreme Court information, references, and resources accessible to the public. By agreeing to use the Supreme Court website, you agree to the collection, use, disclosure, processing, and storage of your non-personal identification information to enable the Supreme Court to monitor the website’s engagement.What personal data do we collect?
The Supreme Court website, other than the Email Form (see separate estrela bet:Privacy Notice – Email Form), does not collect personal data or cookies. The following non-personal identification information, ho♏wever, are collected and stored by WordPress Statistics, a third-party service, to enable the Supreme Court to monitor the website’s performance through its engagement with visitors:
(a) Browser;(b) Device; and(c) Internet Protocol address.The information collected by WordPress Statistics are limited to the foregoing.For further understanding, please see the brief discussion on WordPress Statistics below.Why do we collect your non-personal identification information?
The information collected through WordPress Statistics shall be processed to enable the Supreme Court, not only to effectively manage its website, but also to efficiently disseminate information to the public.How do we process your non-personal identification information?
Where you have provided us with your non-personal identification information, you agree to our collection, use, disclosure, storage, and other processing for the purposes and in the manner set forth in this Privacy Notice.WordPress Statistics
The Supreme Court website uses a third-party website, WordPress Statistics, to gather anonymous statistical information from site visitors and analyze the web traffic data. Such data is not shared with any other party. WordPress Statistics collects the following:How do we protect your non-personal identification information?
The foregoing information, which are encrypted, shall be captured, stored, and retrieved by the Supreme Court through the third-party server, WordPress Statistics, solely for the specific purposes stated in this Privacy Notice, i.e., for reference in helping the Supreme Court in effectively managi♑ng its website. The data shall be processed and stored with utmost security 🐲and confidentiality.
Only authorized website administrators of the Supreme Court have access to the collected data stored and reported in WordPress Statistics as installed in the Supreme Court website, which in turn are subject to strict security protocols.How long will we keep your non-personal identification information?
The collected information shall be stored in the Supreme Court website database. The Public Information Office (PIO) directly administers and maintains the database and the Supreme Court website. Only the PIO website administrators and authorized personnel shall be granted access to the database of the Supreme Court website. Sharing of any information that are contained in the said database with unauthorized persons is strictly prohibited.The non-personal identification information collected by WordPress Statistics is stored in its database and is accessible to the Supreme Court at any time via stꦆatistics reports ꧂until WordPress Statistics is uninstalled.
In all cases, the information will be stored in a secure manner to ensure its confidentiality, integrity, and availability.Upon expiration of the period of retention, the information collected through the Supreme Court website shall be disposed of and discarded in a secure manner that would prevent further processing, unauthorized access, or disclosure of your data.Changes to our Privacy Notice:
The Privacy Notice may be updated from time to time. If material changes are required, any revisions shall be published on the Supreme Court website under the News and Announcements page for your immediate guidance. Therefore, we encourage you to review this Privacy Notice periodically so that you are up to date on our most current policies and practices.This Privacy Notice was last updated on February 20, 2024.
How do you contact us?
If you have any privacy concerns or questions about your data privacy rights or our Privacy Notice, please contact us through:JUDICIARY’S DATA PROTECTION OFFICER
Supreme Court of the Philippines
Padre Faura St., Ermita, Manila
Philippines 1000
estrela bet:+63 3 8552 9566
estrela bet:dataprivacy.royalesporte666.net
Act No. 136 abolished the Audiencia established under General Order No. 20 and declared that the Supreme Court created by the Act be substituted in its place. This effectively severed any nexus between the present Supreme Court and the Audiencia.
The Anglo-American legal system under which the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands was expected to operate was entirely different from the old Spanish system that Filipinos were familiar with. Adjustments had to be made; hence, the decisions of the Supreme Court during its early years reflected a blend of both the Anglo-American and Spanish systems. The jurisprudence was a gentle transition from the old order to the new.During the early Spanish occupation, King Philip II established the Real Audiencia de Manila which was given not only judicial but legislative, executive, advisory, and administrative functions as well. Composed of the incumbent governor general as the presidente (presiding officer), four oidores (equivalent to associate justices), an asesor (legal adviser), an alguacil mayor (chief constable), among other officials, the Real Audiencia de Manila was both a tri✃al and appellate court. It had exclusive origiꦑnal, concurrent original, and exclusive appellate jurisdictions.
Initially, the Audiencia was given a non-judicial role in the colonial administration, to deal with unforeseen problems within the territory that arose from time to time—it was given the power to supervise certain phases of ecclesiastical affairs as well as regulatory functions, such as fixing of prices at which merchants could sell their commodities. Likewise, the Audiencia had executive functions, like the allotment of lands to the settlers of newly established pueblos. However, by 1861, the Audiencia had ceased to perform these executive and administrative functions and had been restricted to the administration of j✤ustice.
When the Audiencia Territorial de Cebu was established in 1886, the name of the Real Audiencia de Manila was changed to Audiencia Territorial de Manila.
The unit of government of the indigenous Filipinos was the barangay, which was a family-based community of 30 to 100 families, occupying a pook (“locality” or “area”) headed by a chieftain called datu who exercised all functions of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—a barangay was not only a political but a social and an economic organization. In the exercise of his judicial authority, the datu acted as a judge (hukom) in settling disputes and deciding cases in hi🅺s baranga෴y.